Canadian Adolescents ' Concerns in the Nuclear Age: Implications for Counsellors and Teachers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
On a demandé à des adolescents (de 10 a 16 ans) de remplir un questionnaire et on les a entretenu de leurs préoccupations concernant la vie à l'ère nucléaire. Les données, utilisées pour des études faites aux Etats-Unis et en Union Soviétique, suggèrent que premièrement, au Canada, les adolescents sont touchés par la menace nucléaire et que deuxièmement, préparer l'avenir, une occupation connue pour sa difficulté au stage de l'adolescence, devient alors une contrainte. De même, les résultats suggèrent des conséquences pour les experts en matière d'éducation. Ce groupe de personnes ne semble pas jouer un rôle important en tant qu'agent social ou agent de communication quant à la manière de traiter l'angoisse et le désespoir des adolescents concernant la menace nucléaire. On a offert des suggestions qui, avec un peu de chance, mettront en valeur à la fois le conseiller et l'enseignant quant à la façon de traiter l'angoisse des adolescents et le désespoir qui vont de pair avec l'époque nucléaire. Early and middle adolescents were asked to complete a questionnaire and to be interviewed regarding their concerns about living in the Nuclear Age. The data, which support studies in
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.013 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.018 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".