MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7098524691

ARCTIC Ethnoarchaeological Perspectives on an Athapaskan Moose Kill

2015· article· en· W7098524691 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPhytochemistry and Biological Activities
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDistribution (mathematics)ArcticSettlement (finance)The arcticHuman settlement
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT. A recent development in anthropology involves examination of living human populations in an attempt to better understand the “for-mation processes ” that create archaeological remains. An ethnologist and an archaeologist collaborated in the observation and analysis of procure-ment, butchering and distribution of moose among a group f contemporary Athapaskan (Chipewyan) Indians in northwestern Saskatchewan in 1977. Subtleties in the behavior of one particular hunting party illustrate the complexity and variability of skeletal and anatomical spatial distributions ac-companying various stages in processing, distributing and consuming a moose (Alres alces rmdersoni). Variables such as seasonality, proximity to a major settlement, transportation technology, sexual division of labor and ideational factors heavily influence the formation of archaeo-faunal remains within several components of a regional settlement system. Key words: ethnoarchaeology, Chipewyan Indians, moose hunting, decision making, site formation RÉSUMÉ. Une recherche anthropologique rkcente comporte I’ttude de populations vivantes en visant une meilleure comprthension des processus qui forment les restes archkologiques. Une ethnologue et un archkologue ont collabork dans l’observation et l’analyse des methodes d’obtention, de boucherie et de distribution d’orignal au sein du’une groupe contemporain d’indiens athapascans (Chipewyans) dans le nord-ouest de la Saskat-chewan. Les subtilitts dans le comportement d’un groupe particulier de chasseurs demontrent la complexitt et la variabilitt des distributions patiales anatomiques et squelettiques suivant les diverses dtapes du dkpeçage, de la distribution et de la consommation d’un orignal (Alres alces undmoni). Des variables telles que le caractere saisonnier, la proximitt B un site majeur d’habitation, la technologic du transport et I’ingeniositk influencent de façon importante la formation de restes archkologiques animaux dans de nombreuses composantes d’une habitation regionale. Mots cl&: ethnoarch6ologie. indiens Chipewyans, chasse B l’orignal, processus de dtcision, formation de sites Traduit pour le journal par Maurice Guibord.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.603
Threshold uncertainty score0.937

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPhytochemistry and Biological ActivitiesFrench-language works237,207