MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7098676315

Book Reviews 297 Brain Trust: The Hidden Connection Between Mad Cow and Misdiagnosed Alzheimer's Disease by Colm A. Kelleher. Paraview Pocket Books, 2004. 312 pp. $22.00 US, $32.00 Canada (hardcover). ISBN 0-7434-9935-2.

2015· article· en· W7098676315 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicBioenergy crop production and management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChronic wasting diseaseMinkDiseaseWastingSubject (documents)CannibalismTribe
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It is troubling, first, because of the subject matter. Kelleher's topic is the relatively new (at least to science) family of brain-wasting diseases known as transmissible spongiform encephalopathies (TSEs). Specific animal TSEs include the bovine affliction BSE, or "Mad Cow Disease, " which has devastated the British and European cattle industries; scrapie, a disease of sheep known for more than two centuries; Chronic Wasting Disease (CWD), which is killing North American deer and elk; and a variant seen in farmed mink (TME), which may be linked, through the mink's feed, to an endemic but undocumented North American variety of BSE. The two best-known human TSEs are kuru, which infected the Fore tribe of New Guinea and was spread by cannibalism, and Creutzfeldt-Jacob Disease (CJD). The latter has been known for decades primarily as a "sporadic " disease of undetermined origin, with less common iatrogenic and familial strains. Since 1996, though, a so-called "new variant" CJD (vCJD), with more than 150 victims thus far in the UK and Europe, has been attributed to eating meat from BSE-infected cows.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.183
Threshold uncertainty score0.613

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1830.115

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.080
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicBioenergy crop production and managementFrench-language works237,207