MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7098715727

Fish Stocks in the southern Scotia Arc region – a review and prospectus Antarctic predator response to fish depletion D

2005· article· en· W7098715727 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicArt History and Market Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDemersal fishShetlandFishingNova scotiaDemersal zonePopulationFish stockEndangered speciesPredator
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We provide a summary of biological aspects and population trends of demersal finfish stocks in the southern Scotia Arc region of Antarctica. Information presented here, drawn largely from recent scientific research surveys, includes aspects of species composition, biomass and stock structure, reproduction and early life history, age, growth, and nat-ural mortality, and diet. Although Antarctic fish faunal groups overlap in the southern Scotia Arc, the region is dominated by species of low-Antarctic origin both in terms of biomass and number of species. Several basic biological parameters of the abundant fish species in the southern Scotia Arc are comparatively well known, though less so in the South Orkney Islands than the South Shetland Islands. These stocks suffered substantial declines as a result of commercial exploitation of mackerel ice fish, Champsocephalus gunnari, and marbled notothenia, Notothenia rossii, in the late 1970s and mid 1980s. This led to a moratorium on directed fishing in 1989–90 which remains in effect. At present, several stocks, with the exception of these two species, appear to have recov-ered. A number of important biological features, such as age, growth, mortality, and the early life history of most species are still poorly understood. Key biological research needs are identified.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.299
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicArt History and Market AnalysisFrench-language works237,207