A New Zealand AR form with its covering envelope
Bibliographic record
Abstract
hown in Figures 1 and 2 is a recently reconstructed pair of items, an ar form and the covering envelope that was used to return it to the sender of the original registered item. Recall from [h1, h2] that ar stands for avis de réception, a service elaborating registration, that provides for a form or card to be signed and returned to the sender of the registered item, as an indication that delivery was successful. It was available on international mail between the original set of upu members from 1875, and among all upu members from 1879 on. During the period of effectiveness of the Treaty of Vienna, 1 July 1892–31 December 1898, a registered item sent with ar would be so-marked, and the ar fee paid on the envelope (a moot point in this particular case, since ar was a free option from the United States). When the item arrived in the destination country, an ar form was prepared, and when the item was picked up or delivered, the form would be signed by the recipient, and the form returned to the post office of origin (in this case, Dayton, Ohio), which would then ensure that the recipient got it. Since the ar fee was paid on the cover, no stamps were applied to the form (in contrast, for domestic NZ ar, and later in the period, for ar mail between Australian states and NZ, stamps paying the ar fee were applied to the form [wl]). New Zealand used ar forms that required covering envelopes (some countries, such as Canada, used
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.024 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.404 | 0.338 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".