Bibliographic record
Abstract
Since the origin of Internet (back to the 1960s), Science, Education, Commercialization and socialization have changed dramatically. As of 2009, an estimated quarter of Earth's population uses the services of the Internet. So we could say that there is no boundaries, no limits to get to know the different cultures in the world. Internet is the perfect path to promote the intercultural relationships. Under that idea and after analyzing all the possibilities to promote significant learning among these and the future generations, we found in YouTube an excellent site to do that, full of public sources to be used as teaching aids. The domain name “YouTube.com ” was started on February 15, 2005. During the summer of 2006, YouTube was one of the fastest growing websites on the web and was ranked the 5th most popular website on Alexa. The website averages nearly 20 million visitors per month, according to Nielsen/NetRatings. It is well known that over 100 million video clips are viewed daily on YouTube, with an additional 65,000 new videos uploaded every 24 hours. About the users, where around 44 % are female, 56 % male, and the 12- to 17-year-old age group is dominant. According to the website Hitwise.com, YouTube commands up to 64 % of the UK online video market. Just Imagine the potential of all those videos, many teachers download
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".