World: a synonym of Amnestus pusillus Uhler (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Cydnidae)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
his revision for the Western Hemisphere Cydnidae. Jerzy A. Lis (1998), in a short paper and based on one male and three females collected by Linnavouri in Iran in 1994, described Amnestus raunoi, as the first representative of the subfamily Amnestinae in the Old World. Later, Linnavouri collected A. raunoi in several regions of the Gilan Province; in the localities of Sume-eh Sara, Anzali, Dashte-Veel, Rasht, Seravan, also in Iran (Linnavouri, 2007). Ghahari et al. (2009) in their catalog of the Iranian burrower bugs, reported A. raunoi only for the Gilan Province. Lis (1998) in his paper mentioned its similarity to Amnestus pusillus Uhler, distributed from Canada to Guatemala. Recently we received a loan from the Cardiff Museum with representatives of Amnestus raunoi that came from the same type locality where the species was described. After reviewing all the external characters and measurements, including prosternal carina, spines of legs, and other characters, and comparing it with more than 250 specimens of Amnestus pusillus, we now discover that all of them correspond to the same species. Males were dissected and the parameres studied, which according to our knowledge of this genus a very good character to differentiate and ratify the species. And the study of the parameres also showed that both species are the same. Therefore, according to our findings, we conclude that Amnestus raunoi is a synonym of Amnestus pusillus, a species with wide distribution in the American continent. It may be that a few specimens of Amnestus pusillus were
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".