MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7098987716

COMPARISON OF MODEL AND PROPAGATION MEASUREMENT-BASED BER PERFORMANCE PREDICTIONS FOR RAKE RECEIVERS IN URBAN MICROCELLULAR WCDMA SYSTEMS

2014· article· en· W7098987716 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial and Economic Development in India
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRakeMultipath propagationRake receiverW-CDMACode division multiple accessRayleigh fadingDelay spreadTelecommunications linkBit error rate
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

One of the WCDMA service specifications is the delivery of data rates up to 2 Mbps to a single user on a downlink channel. The transmission of such high data rates in an urban propagation environment, however, poses unique problems not encountered previously in DSSS systems intended primarily for voice and low data rate traffic. At high data rates, both multiple-access interference (MAI) and multipath-induced self-interference (SI) can become significant sources of bit error rate (BER) degradation. This is a consequence of the high cross-correlation sidelobes that result from the use of short spreading sequences to achieve high data rates if the system bandwidth is fixed. Although MAI can be mitigated using an increase in power transmitted to the desired user, reductions in SI cannot be achieved by this means. Adequate modelling and simulation of SI effects is therefore a topic of increasing importance. In addition, when analysing the performance of Rake receivers to be used in WCDMA systems it is often assumed that resolvable multipath groups (i.e. delay line model taps) have equal average power and independent, Rayleigh fading statistics. However propagation mea-surements conducted in downtown Ottawa reveal that these assumptions are not valid. This paper reports a method by which the above-cited problems and simplifying assumptions used to erroneously predict WCDMA link performance can be avoided. A computationally-efficient semi-analytical technique (SAT) will be introduced. This technique extends the work of Lehnert and Pursley [1], which analysed the effects of MAI in non-fading conditions, to accurately account for SI

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.932
Threshold uncertainty score0.222

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.073
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSocial and Economic Development in IndiaFrench-language works237,207