Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study examined the influences of mothers' involvement in their children's social lives. Subjects were 143 children in grades 3 through 6 in two schools in the Kitchener-Waterloo region of Ontario and their mothers. Information on children's social behavior was obtained from peer ratings on the Revised Class Play test. Mothers completed questionnaires assessing their own peer group experiences in childhood and currently; their affective reactions to peer experiences; the value they placed on sociability and obedience; and their beliefs about their children's social behavior. Mothers also completed a checklist assessing their involvement ia their children's lives. Four principal types of activities characterized mothers ' involvement. These were Monitoring, Orchestration, Advice and Support, and High-Concern activities. Mothers tended to perceive their children as having the same level of sociability as they viewed themselves as having. Mothers who valued sociability tended to perceive their children's social behavior similarly to the way peers did. Results of the mal-ernal involvement assessment included: (1) mothers who were socially withdrawn in clildhood or sociable as aoPalts had higher orchestration scores; (2) maternal involvement was greater when mothers perceived their children to be withdrawn; and (3) the more concerned mothers were, the greater were their advice and support and high-concern scores. A reference list of 15 items is included. (BC) Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made from the original document. cez
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.150 | 0.028 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".