MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7099131969

Measurements ofPhotolyzable Halogen Compounds and Bromine Radicals during the Polar Sunrise Experiment 1997

2016· article· en· W7099131969 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOptimal Power Flow Distribution
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSunriseBromineHalogenOzone depletionPolarOzoneChlorine
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract. As part of the Polar Sunrise Experiment (PSE) 1997, concentrations of halogen species thought to be involved in ground level Arctic ozone depletion were made at Alert, NWT, Canada (82.5"N, 62.3°W) during the months of March and April, 1997. Measurements were made of photolyzable chlorine (Cl, and HOCI) and bromine (Br, and HOBr) using the Photoactive Halogen Detector (PHD), and bromine radicals (BrOx) using a modified radical amplifier. During the sampling period between Julian Day 86 (March 27) and Day 102 (April 12), two ozone depletion episodes occurred, the most notable being on days 96-99, when ozone levels were below detectable limits (",1 ppbv). Concentrations of BrOx above the 4 pptv detection limit were found for a significant part of the study, both during and outside of depletion events. The highest BrO, concentrations were observed at the end of the depletion event, when the concentration reached 15 pptv. We found substantial amounts of Br2 in the absence of 0 " indicating that 0, is not a necessary requirement for production of Br,. There is also Br, present when winds are from the south, implying local scale (e.g. from the snowpack) production. During the principal 0, depletion event, the HOBr concentration rose to ",260 pptv, coincident with the BrO, maximum. This implies a steady state HO, concentration of 6 pptv. During a partial 0, depletion event, we estimate that the flux ofBr, from the surface is about 10 times greater than that for Cl,.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.042

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicOptimal Power Flow DistributionFrench-language works237,207