CROSS-CULTURAL COUNSELLING: SOME SPECIAL PROBLEMS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE CANADIAN COUNSELLOR
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The need for developing particular skills for working with clients who are racially or culturally dissimilar from the counsellor is becoming increasingly apparent; especially in the Canadian society. Problems for both client and counsellor do occur in the cross-cultural situation. The more frequent difficulties are discussed and recommendations for ways in which counsellors and counsellor educators can meet this challenge are discussed. Resume Il devient de plus en plus impérieux, spécialement au sein de la société cana-dienne, d'acquérir des habiletés particulières en vue de travailler auprès de clients qui, d'un point de vue racial ou culturel, sont différents de leur conseiller. La relation de nature interculturelle est effectivement problématique à Ia fois pour le client et le conseiller. On trouve dans le présent article une discussion des difficultés les plus fréquentes ainsi que des recommandations quant à diverses façons auxquelles peuvent recourir les conseillers et les formateurs en vue de relever un tel défi. The purpose of this paper is to examine some of the problems which occur when the culturally or racially dissimilar individual comes in contact with a counsellor, especially a counsellor who is a member of the majority group. The contact may occur between the client and a counsellor in a variety of settings e.g. school, manpower offices, social service agencies etc. Some recommendations for ways in which counsellors can better meet the needs of these clients are also presented. Methods and means of counselling minori-ty group clients have been less than satisfactory Reprint requests should be sent to Marvin J. West-
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.009 | 0.013 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.018 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.009 | 0.007 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".