MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7099265039

Senate Democratic Policy Committee Hearing “Are We Exporting American Jobs?”

2003· article· en· W7099265039 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicEconomic, Social, and Health Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuarter (Canadian coin)Liberian dollarPaceRecessionInvestment (military)State (computer science)Real gross domestic productBusiness cycleDemocracy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

States Chamber of Commerce, the world’s largest business federation representing more than three million members and organizations of every size, sector, and region. We appreciate the opportunity to appear before you today to discuss the U.S. economy, the jobless recovery, and state of our manufacturing sector. The Current Economic Environment and the Jobless Recovery Although, the U.S. economy emerged from the last recession in November 2001, real economic growth remained lackluster advancing at less than a 3 percent pace for four quarters. Beginning in the second quarter of this year, however, the economy began to accelerate. Real GDP growth was 3.3 percent in the second quarter and a remarkable 7.2 percent in the third quarter of this year. At the same time, economic growth has become more balanced with business fixed investment growing more than 11 percent at an annual rate in the third quarter, and investment in equipment and software advancing at a 15.4 percent annual pace over the same period. With the inventory-to-sales ratio at a record low level, a likelihood that the dollar will depreciate further, an expectation of somewhat lower oil prices, and the emergence of stronger than expected growth abroad, the prospects for economic growth in the near term look very good.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.069
Threshold uncertainty score0.224

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0100.002
Scholarly communication0.0110.005
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0260.016
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0670.038

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.089
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEconomic, Social, and Health StudiesFrench-language works237,207