NOTES Cutaneous Diphtheria in the Urban Poor Population of Vancouver,
Bibliographic record
Abstract
were reviewed. Cases were associated with injection drug use and poverty. Coinfections with Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pyogenes, and Arcanobacterium haemolyticum occurred. Corynebacterium diphtheriae is endemic in Vancouver’s urban core, with strains of multilocus sequence type (MLST) 76 predominating. Corynebacterium diphtheriae is a reemerging pathogen (11). It is endemic in many developing countries and has been as-sociated with outbreaks in developed countries (19). Cutane-ous diphtheria is characterized by a chronic, nonhealing ulcer, often a source for persistent colonization (6). It has the poten-tial to cause systemic disease and may be an important reser-voir for ongoing transmission within a susceptible population (23). In Vancouver, Canada, a susceptible population exists in the “downtown eastside ” (DTES), which represents a poor inner-city community with high rates of injection drug use, HIV infection, and homelessness (3, 25, 28). Outbreaks of C. diph-theriae have been previously reported in this community (5, 23). Thus, a clinical, microbiological, and molecular review of cutaneous diphtheria patients presenting to St. Paul’s Hospital,
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".