This Market Rule number is located on the “Current Market Rule Amendment ” web page. Date Relevant Amendment Submission, Proposed or Recommended Rule Amendment Posted for
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Provide your comments. Safety Power Inc. is a newly established company focused on the development of a strategic business opportunity involving the aggregation of standby generators in the Province of Ontario. The purpose of which is to provide a dispatchable generation asset base for use during peak periods. PowerStream Inc. and Safety Power Inc. have recently partnered to implement a "Pilot Project " within PowerStream's service area involving the use of a 1MW standby generator. The Project is expected to be operational this summer. We believe that the Safety Power Program is a viable solution to addressing the increasing power supply issues like those being experienced in the York Region. Furthermore, it is our strong belief that some form of realistic pricing compensation needs to be in place in order to provide the proper incentives to encourage investment in DR and peaking generation. This incentive can be in the form of "scarcity pricing " on the HOEP or some form of capacity payment made to companies like Safety Power. Safety Power Inc. is formally submitting these comments in support of the IESO's proposed rule ammendment and wish to congratulate you on your efforts to mitigate the counterintuitive impact on electricity pricing during "emergency " situations. PART 4 – EXTERNAL CONSULTATION MEETING
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.010 | 0.047 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.012 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.013 | 0.009 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.595 | 0.630 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".