Shanghai Medical University Shanghai 200032, People's Republic of China
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To confirm the main etiological antigen of farmer's lung in Dafeng County, Jiangsu Province, People's Republic of China, precipitins in serum from 30 patients with farmer's lung were tested with several strains of antigens. Reactions against two strains of T.vu/garis were shown in 46.7 % and 66.7Y0 of the patients group, which were significantly higher than in the controls, while the percentage of reactions against Faenia rectivirgula and A.fumigates were low in the patients group and had no significant difference with the controls. The results indicate that the main etiological agents were some strains of T.vu/garis. This finding was consistent with the microbiological study of sputum of the patients and moldy hay samples from the working area. Key words: China, etiology, farmer's lung, serology, Thermoactinomycetes vulgaris. Farmer's lung is a kind of extrinsic allergic alveolitis caused by the inhalation of moldy hay dust. I t has been reported i n Europe, America, Canada and Australia, but there was no systematic investigation of this disease in China t i l l 1980. From 1980 to 198 1, an epidemiological survey was conducted among hay grinders in nine communes and two farms in Dafeng County, Jiangsu Province. In this county, hay is ground and fermented to feed pigs. The hay usually becomes moldy because of the humid weather in eastern China. A total of 120 of 1,054 grinders had a history of farmer's lung syndrome, including chills, fever, chest tightness and coughing after exposure to moldy hay dust, which was determined by the authors based on the grinders ' answers to a
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.071 | 0.016 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".