Bibliographic record
Abstract
(PHWR) that is fueled by natural uranium. Kanupp was supplied by Atomic Energy of Canada, Ltd. (AECL) and is under IAEA safeguards. The plant, owned and managed by the Pakistan Atomic Energy Commission (PAEC), became fully operational on 10/4/72. The facility is the site of a heavy water upgrading plant with a 15 MT per year capacity 1 as well as the Karachi Nuclear Power Training Center, 2 established in 1973. 3 Chashma Chashma-1 is a 300 MW pressurized water reactor (PWR) being built by the China National Nuclear Corporation. Work on the facility began in 1993 and is expected to be completed in late 1997; 4 the facility is expected to be commissioned in 10/98. 5 Chashma will be placed under IAEA safeguards. 6 Pakistan has proposed building a second 300 MW PWR at the site, and China has agreed in principle to build a Chashma-2 reactor if financing is secured. 7Pakistan has a partially built plutonium reprocessing plant at Chashma, construction of which was started by France, but abandoned in 1978. Some US intelligence officials believe the facility is being completed either indigenously or with Chinese assistance, 8 but China could be working on a fuel fabrication facility instead. 9 The contract for the Chashma-1 reactor stipulates that China will provide Pakistan with a fuel fabrication facility. The facility may be part of activities undertaken by staff at
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.232 | 0.128 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".