The Effects of Ambient Ozone on Lung Function in Children: A Reanalysis of
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Studies of childr attendin s er camps ofien have obsered relatio ps between daily outdoor ozone (03) c o ns ad d e lung finction hat are li similar to results seen in human chamber studies. The former studies, focusing on the pulmonary effects of O3 and a ted pollutant on childrn under natural conditions of exposure, are potentially of great importance o. understanding the public health impact.of ambet 0. However, a thorough t of the reults of-these studies has been by d d rences he analys and Xopo ~ o data acrosst v. We oba ed s f s su er p stde care u bthe sepaae inetgtv grups, nldn w Ne Jesytuispr fome by New Yor Unvriy tw stde nOtrocridu yHat n efr Canada, and two studIes in southern California. The data_coiw'. of sunil ymeamoeet ofrcd sfiquetv m in1le (FEYJ), pek prtor lwrt (PEER), and 1-hr0 ocetao n th hou pcd mg fucionmaueetsfrec cild We anlye the relionslubewen ug fhwion and 03 using linea rqegrsson models tht fit subject-specific inecpts sa a sigl, pold03 slope. Thxese models wer fit fior eac of the;; 5 t..: g. p s in stuierseprtl and fr al stde ombined. All of the study-specific slopes of FEY1 on ()were negative (i.e,- nresed0 associted with deceae FEY1); five of snwere statsically sigiiatAayi ofthes nd in-tdy data set yielded a slope of-0,50 ml FEV1/ppb 03 (pg0.OOOI). Aditiono im-r arible to de combindataalysiis diminished, bult did abe Combine ver tuia m..-- reaionship i wasoseredIetwen PEER and 03.-M.!.ivle:ten,:iegntio lo #:fimetionij own sfln egress:onumode Hathafi Howerer, this nestia find Apa it be pae tim tends in PEFR. Theresults ofdui pte evine that cildre posed to3i ii iuder natural conditions perence o the kind demotrad studies, and.ato::s*h is:(g., pulmonae inlmain)s;yas ou liiyon peope epsd tX amient 03 ey wod airplution children, epidemiology,;gulonry fun*tion ozone,;summercamps.E...nH Ozone (03) is a ubiquitous pollutant in outdoor air, frequently reaching 1-hr concentrations that exceed the National
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".