MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7099767043

Jens von Bergmann (University of Calgary),

2010· article· en· W7099767043 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicHolomorphic and Operator Theory
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMetric (unit)Field (mathematics)Manifold (fluid mechanics)Tangent spacePoint (geometry)Symplectic geometryPlane (geometry)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this report, we remember our dearest friend and colleague, Pit-Mann Wong. It was his inspiration which lead to the proposal for this workshop and its organization. In the weeks before the workshop, he was diagnosed with a severe form of liver cancer, and was unable to attend the workshop; unfortunately, he has since passed away, on July 3 of this year. We will remember him and miss him. 1 Overview of the Field The Kobayashi metric is a key intrinsic quantity associated to complex manifolds, if it is nondegenerate then the manifold is said to be hyperbolic; the study of hyperbolicity is central in much of complex geometry. This workshop aimed to extend notions and theorems regarding hyperbolicity to the (much more general) area of almost-complex and symplectic geometry, thus finding a range of applications to an exciting field of modern mathematics. Let (M, J) be an almost complex manifold and ∆r, r> 0, be the disc of radius r, centered at the origin, in the complex plane C. At a point x ∈ M and a tangent vector v ∈ TxM, denote by Hol(∆r,M)(x, v) the space of all J-holomorphic curves from ∆r into M with the properties that f(0) = x and f ′ (0) = v. The J-Kobayashi pseudo-metric is defined by κJ(x, v) = inf 1

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.217
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHolomorphic and Operator TheoryFrench-language works237,207