MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7099783993

Investment in Growth of Tennessee's Workforce and Local Workforce Investment Areas for the Short- and Long-term,

2010· article· en· W7099783993 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLibraries and Information Services
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConsumption (sociology)WorkforceUnemploymentInvestment (military)Quarter (Canadian coin)Unemployment rate
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

longer than ever Development in the last quarter Areas. century, Duration while of unemployment unemployment is claims longer than have ever been in increasing the last quarter monthly by double-digit percentages. century, while Some unemployment recent data show claims some have improvement been increasing among monthly otherwise by mixed double-digit employment indicators. Consumer percentages. confidence Some is recent improving, data along show with some favorable improvement interest among rates. otherwise Checking and mixed savings deposits are growing, employment but general indicators. consumption Consumer and confidence housing and is vehicle improving, sales along remain with tepid. favorable Nationally interest the rate of increase in wages rates. and Checking benefits and of savings workers deposits has slowed are growing, from 2006. but Revival general of consumption industry depends and housing on workers balancing necessary and vehicle expenditures sales remain while increasing tepid. Nationally savings. the Improvement rate of increase in employment in wages and usually benefits contributes of to increasing consumption workers has of slowed goods, but from an increase 2006. Revival in employment of industry is also depends the result on of workers increased balancing consumption. necessary expenditures while increasing savings. Improvement in employment usually Goods-producing contributes industries to are increasing projected consumption to decline of sharply goods, but at an 3.3 increase percent in during employment 2009-2010. is also the Serviceproviding

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.912
Threshold uncertainty score0.452

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.088
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicLibraries and Information ServicesFrench-language works237,207