Request for Relief from Exchange Act Reporting Requirements During
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ladies and Gentlemen: On behalf of CIL&D, LLC (f/k/a Kaiser Ventures LLC), a Delaware limited liability company (the “Company”), we hereby submit a request for relief from various reporting requirements under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). The Company respectfully requests that the Staff (the “Staff’) of the Securities and Exchange Commission grant the Company relief from any further reporting requirements under Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act (commencing with relief from the requirement to file its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2013), provided that the Company undertakes to disclose any material developments relating to the liquidation and dissolution of the Company by filing Current Reports on Form 8-K. The Company’s Board of Managers approved a Plan of Dissolution and Liquidation of the Company (the “Plan of Dissolution”), which was approved by the members of the Company at a special meeting held on May 22, 2013 (the “Special Meeting”). Pursuant to the Company’s then current operating agreement and the Delaware Limited Liability Company Act (the “DLLCA”), the Company was dissolved upon the approval of the holders of a majority of the Company’s Class A units. At the Special Meeting all the proposals related to the dissolution of the Company were approved by the requisite vote of the Class A members. Accordingly, with the approval of the Plan of Dissolution on May 22, 2013 (the “Effective Date”), the Company is now dissolved under Delaware law and will proceed to wind up its
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.022 | 0.113 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.026 | 0.014 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.160 | 0.183 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".