MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7099913166

PEST STATUS OF WEED Spotted knapweed, Centaurea maculosa Lamarck, is

2014· article· en· W7099913166 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicSpecies Distribution and Climate Change
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRangelandInfestationWeedLivestockInvasive speciesGrazingWildlifeIntroduced species
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ing three to five years on average. It infests semiarid range lands in the western United States and road-sides and fields in the eastern part of the country. Infested areas are dominated by the plant, reducing their grazing value and suppressing native plant com-munities. The plant, originally from Central Asia, has been in North America for over 120 years. Nature of Damage Economic damage. Spotted knapweed is a serious problem on rangeland, especially in the western United States. Bucher (1984) estimated that an 800,000 ha infestation in Montana was causing $4.5 million in annual forage losses, and that invasion of 13.6 million ha of vulnerable rangeland in Montana would cost cattle and sheep ranchers $155.7 million of gross revenue annually. Hirsh and Leitch (1996) reported that an 800,000 ha infestation of spotted knapweed, in combination with two knapweeds of minor importance in Montana (diffuse knapweed, Centaurea diffusa Lamarck, and Russian knapweed, Acroptilon repens [L] de Candolle) was causing $14 million in direct negative impacts and $28 million in indirect effects (i.e., reduced regional economy) to the state of Montana. Harris and Cranston (1979) reported that the 30,000 ha infestation in Canada was reducing forage production more than 88%. In the northeastern and northcentral United States, the plant is primarily a problem of roadsides, fields, and waste areas (Hoebeke, 1993); economic impact of the plant in those regions has not been reported. Ecological damage. Spotted knapweed reduces livestock and wildlife forage (Thompson, 1996; Watson and Renney, 1974), increases surface water runoff and soil sedimentation (Lacey et al., 1989), and lowers plant diversity (Tyser and Key, 1988). Spot-ted knapweed produces an allelopathic compound that reduces germination of some grass species (Kelsey and Locken, 1987). Geographical Distribution Spotted knapweed is native to Europe and western Asia but has become widespread in parts of the United States and Canada. The plant occurs through-

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.058

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSpecies Distribution and Climate Change→French-language works237,207→