Bibliographic record
Abstract
• In 2004/2005, there were about 31,700 young persons (aged 12 to 17 years) admitted to correctional services. Of those, 15,900 (50%) admissions were to custody and 15,800 (50%) admissions were to community supervision, with the majority (12,900 or 81%) of community supervision admissions being to probation. • There were approximately 2,200 admissions to each of secure and open custody. The majority of admissions to custody (72 % or 11,500) were to remand (pre-trial detention). • Although admissions to remand decreased 7 % from 2003/2004, as a proportion of total admissions to correctional services it was up to 36 % in 2004/2005, from 34 % in the previous year. • Aboriginal youth are highly represented within correctional services. Nearly one-third of all females and just over one-in-fi ve males admitted to sentenced custody were Aboriginal. Overall, Aboriginal youth made up one-quarter of all sentenced custody admissions in 2004/2005, yet they represent approximately 5 % of the total youth population. • On any given day in 2004/2005, there were approximately 13,100 young persons either in custody or under supervised probation in Canada. The majority of young persons in correctional services were on probation (87%), while 10 % were in sentenced custody, and 3 % were in remand. • Coinciding with a decline in the youth crime rate, both the total rate of youth incarceration (sentenced custody and remand) and the probation rate decreased in 2004/2005 – by 10 % and 16 % respectively. Accessing and ordering information This product, catalogue no. 85-002-XIE, is available for free in electronic format. To obtain a single issue, visit our website at www.statcan.ca and select Publications. ISSN 1209-6393 This product, catalogue no. 85-002-XPE, is also available as a standard printed publication at a
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.510 | 0.258 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".