Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
These applications were made on or after January 1, 2007 and are subject to the new provisions of the Planning Act and the City of Toronto Act, 2006. The rezoning application originally proposed to redevelop the lands at 306-322 Richmond Street West, with a 19-storey (64 metre) mixed-use building. A Preliminary Report regarding this proposal was considered by Community Council in August 2007, and a Community Consultation meeting was held on June 19, 2007. In March 2008, the application and supporting studies were revised to reflect a proposed development of a 35-storey (125.1metres) mixed-use building consisting of approximately 4,459 square metres of retail, commercial, and office uses, with approximately 22,040 square metres of residential gross floor area, resulting in 322 residential dwelling units. On June 25th, 2008, the proposed development was revised to a thirty-five storey building (121.7 metres plus 5 metres for the mechanical penthouse), comprised of 150 hotel suite units and 150 residetial dwelling units (68 1-bedroom; 58 2-bedroom units and 24 3-bedroom units). Staff report for action – Final Report – 306-322 Richmond Street West 2 The current rendition of the development that is the subject of this report was submitted on December 1, 2008, which maintains the 35 storey building form with a slightly taller building of 123.3 metres (plus 5 metres for the mechanical penthouse). The building is now proposed to consist of 141 Hotel Suites and 130 residential dwelling units (1 studio
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it