CANADIAN WOMAN STUDIESILES CAHIERS DE LA FEMME Violence Against Women in the Context of Mental Illness Hidden Costs for Sisters Who are Caregivers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
femmes duns le contexte de la sante' mentale en e'tudiant les cas d'aide apporte'e aau maladepar les membres de la famille. L 'histoire de cm de trois femmes dkmontre comment la violence est entrke duns la famille et a laisskdes se'quelh qu 'elles apporteront aver elles duns leur rble de&tures soignantes. Canadian and American estimates suggest that up to 2.6 per cent of the population is diagnosed with a men-tal illness (Baronet). Some of these people are able to manage their ill-ness independently, or with the as-sistance of mental health profession-als. However, alarge number ofthese individuals are reliant on caregiving by family members, particularly if they are diagnosed with a serious and persistent mental illness like schizo-phrenia (Schizophrenia Society of Canada). Work by many researchers establishes that family members who take on this role experience high lev-els of stress and burden (Baronet; Saunders). These consequences are experienced primarily by mothers, who are usually the primary caregivers for people diagnosed with mental illnesses (Lefley and Hatfield). Yet, as the current generation of caregivers ages and becomes less available, sis-ters are taking on responsibility for caregiving of siblings who continue to need high levels of support and care (Pickett-Schenk). There are important differences between the caregiving that occurs between sisters and their ill siblings and the caregiving that occurs when mothers care for their adult chil-dren. First, the sibling relationship is one of the most enduring in any family (Cicirelli). Therefore, the commitment to caregiving for a brother or sister has no foreseeable time limit and can become an ex-CHARMAINE C. W l L L l A M S tended, life-long obligation. Sec-ond, sibling family relationships are more horizontal and egalitarian than parent-child relationships and, with adulthood, connections between siblings become voluntary
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".