Oxygen and carbon isotopic composition of Grenville marble, and an appraisal of equilibrium in the distribution of isotopes between calcite and associated minerals
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Marble occurs abundantly in a portion of the Grenville Province of the Canadian Shield extending from the Adirondack Mountains, through Ontario, and into the Laurentian Highlands of Quebec, a distance of 300 km. In the Otter Lake area of western Quebec, major marble units, which are obviously metamorphosed limestone, consist of combinations of calcite, dolomite, olivine, humite-group minerals, Ca pyroxene, Ca amphibole, biotite, graphite, and retrograde serpentine and brucite, whereas minor marble units, which are evidently metasomatic rocks, consist of combinations of (pink) calcite, Ca pyroxene, Ca amphibole, biotite, garnet, K-feldspar, scapolite, and titanite. The oxygen and carbon isotopic composition of calcite in the major marble units (18OVSMOW in the range 28 to 17‰; 13CPDB–1 in the range +6 to –2‰) is the same as in the Adirondacks and in unmetamorphosed Proterozoic limestone; only slight shifts (~1‰) can be attributed directly to metamorphic reactions. In bodies of minor marble, mean concentrations of 18O and 13C are slightly lower (+14.5 and +0.23‰, respectively). Mean fractionation-factors (), expressed
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".