MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7100307369

GUIDANCE SERVICES FOR BILINGUAL EDUCATION

2016· article· en· W7100307369 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMultilingual Education and Policy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCurriculumBilingual educationService (business)Curriculum developmentFirst languageMultilingualismNeuroscience of multilingualism
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper outlines the development of a new bilingual programming (French immersion) for our schools. It documents the lack of development of adequate guidance service for these programs and presents a needs assessment for the devel-opment of guidance and counselling services. It provides a rationale why counsellors should address the following issues in bilingual education: (a) the need for guidance services in elementary schools, (b) the need for additional guidance services in secondary schools, (c) the need for training of fully qualified bilingual counsellors, and (d) the need for in-service training of all counsellors in French immersion schools. Cet article trace les grandes lignes de l'élaboration d'un nouveau programme de bilinguisme (immersion en langue française). En rapport avec ce programme, l'auteur présente de façon documentée le manque de développement d'un service d'orientation approprié et propose une évaluation des besoins en termes d'orienta-tion et de counselling. On trouve aussi un fondement au fait que les conseillers doivent s'interroger sur les aspects suivants de l'éducation bilingue: (a) le besoin de services d'orientation à l'école primaire, (b) le besoin de services d'orientation addi-tionnels à l'école secondaire, (c) le besoin de préparation de conseillers bilingues parfaitement qualifiés et (d) le besoin de formation à l'endroit de travail de tous les conseillers oeuvrant dans des écoles dotées de programmes d'immersion en langue française. Résumé Within the past decade, a new curriculum has been developed for the English speaking schools in the form of bilingual education. These programs commonly known as French immersion curricula have emerged from Canada's official language laws which seek to foster bilingual, French and English, speaking Canadians. The demand for this curriculum has been overwhelming. It has evolved from a single model program (early French immersion) to multi-phase programs that encompass over 500 schools with approximately 80,000

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.251
Threshold uncertainty score0.840

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.006
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2510.084

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.499
Teacher spread0.442 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMultilingual Education and Policy→French-language works237,207→