Bibliographic record
Abstract
Yellowtail flounder range from Labrador to Chesapeake Bay and are considered relatively sedentary. A major concentration of yellowtail occurs on Georges Bank to the east of the Great South Channel. While tagging work indicates limited movement from Georges Bank to adjacent areas, knowledge of seasonal movement of yellowtail flounder on Georges Bank is poor. Yellowtail flounder are most commonly caught at depths between 37 and 73 meters (20 and 40 fathoms). On Georges Bank, spawning occurs during the late spring period peaking in May. From the distribution of both ichthyoplankton and mature adults, it appears that spawning occurs on both sides of the international boundary. Yellowtail flounder appear to have variable maturity schedules, with age two females considered 40 % mature during periods of high stock biomass to 90 % mature during periods of low stock biomass. The Canadian fishery is mainly pursued using otter trawl gear from vessels less than 65’. This directed fishery for yellowtail flounder is a relatively recent development, with significant catches first occurring after the introduction of specialized gear in 1993. Most vessels use trawls equipped with small rollers and employ less headline flotation, giving a smaller vertical opening. The fishery occurs in a relatively limited portion of Georges Bank known as the Yellowtail Hole (5Zm), and with current management restrictions, operates in the latter half of the year only. Both Canada and the USA employ the same management unit.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".