MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7100346977

Human Resource Development Review / December 2002 Drodge, Murphy / EMOTIONS IN POLICE LEADERSHIP Interrogating Emotions in Police Leadership

2016· article· en· W7100346977 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEmotional Labor in Professions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLeadership studiesContext (archaeology)Action (physics)Emotional intelligenceIrrational numberShared leadershipTransactional leadershipLeadership
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Theoretical discourse about leadership was traditionally conceived as a rational process of social action emanating from a leader whose traits were deemed largely responsible for the success or failure of the organiza-tion. The role of emotions in leadership, when they were discussed at all, tended to be viewed either negatively as irrational dimensions of mind interfering with the rational business of leading or as a discrete psycho-logical category subsumed within emotional intelligence. In this article, the authors conceptualize emotions holistically as an embodied phenome-non that mediates the social process of leadership. They discuss police leadership as a specific organizational context that shapes and constrains emotional expression and suggest ways that emotional intelligence might be construed to aid police leadership development. Leadership ranks among the most researched and debated topics in the social sciences (George, 2000). Recently, police organizations have suc-cumbed to the allure of leadership as a topic of discussion and research (Adlam, 2001; Kobe, Reiter-Palmon, & Rickers, 2001). In some countries, Canada for instance, the expected exodus of senior police leaders as baby boomers retire en masse lends a sense of urgency to the issue of leadership succession planning and development. At a practical level, identifying who may be a good police leader and defining the characteristics of effective police leadership remain a challenge. However, the broad topic of leader-ship is even more problematic if one considers the theoretical heterogeneity of the field (Yukl, 2002) and the deeper question of defining leadership (Barker, 2001). In this article, we fuse our interest in police leadership to our understanding of contemporary theorizing and research on the topic of emotions. Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Edward N. Drodge, HR Research and

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.084

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0050.008
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0250.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.204
GPT teacher head0.391
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEmotional Labor in ProfessionsFrench-language works237,207