MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7100411545

Low-temperature synthesis of nanoscale deposition in a test tube

2010· article· en· W7100411545 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMesoporous Materials and Catalysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNanoscopic scaleChemical vapor depositionPolymerColloidGraphiteFourier transform infrared spectroscopyColloidal silicaColloidal crystalAtomic layer deposition
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

mi fac ate ien nos ms de spa sili ting of es, geometries for nanoscale structures as small as 1-2 nm. Furthermore, optical and chemical properties of the resulting deposition of metal oxides at lower temperatures are useful for remaining Si–Cl bonds by H2O, and condensation polymeri-zation to create a new silica layer.13,14 These two reactions can be uniform and controlled thick-Previous applications of SiCl4 ng silica spheres in a colloidal grown along a graphite step ly moisture-sensitive and it ch bring significant practical by FTIR spectroscopy that e used for SiO2 ALD at RT, mples of silica layer growth at apor, include the infiltrated at 90 C),18 an encapsulation t RT),19 and the structural ca film (at 130 C).20 However, 20TH ANNIVERSARY ARTICLE www.rsc.org/materials | Journal of Materials ChemistryDept of Chemistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canadanone of these examples include the controlled growth by sequential multilayers. Herein, we demonstrate the application of alkoxysilane vapor (tetramethoxysilane, TMOS) for the low-temperature growth of multiple silica layers, using inexpensive benchtop lab equipment and in an ambient environment. We illustrate this TMOS ALD method by growing silica multilayers around polymer colloidal spheres and within a colloidal crystal (opal) structure. The rapid and simple nature of this method means it could easily be applied in any physics, chemistry or

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMesoporous Materials and CatalysisFrench-language works237,207