YUKON EXPLORATION AND GEOLOGY 2004 167
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Extensive conglomeratic strata in the Late Jurassic to Early Cretaceous Tantalus Formation were deposited in both shallow gravel-bed braided rivers, and deeper meandering gravel bed rivers. Overbank, marsh and swamp deposits, with potential to contain abundant terrestrial organic materials, are restricted to recessive intervals associated with small sandy and gravelly high-constructive river systems. Medium- to high-volatile bituminous and anthracitic coals in these intervals have limited potential as a source of additional gaseous hydrocarbons. Most of the conglomerates have a high fracture density, which would make them good reservoirs for coal-bed methane in settings where the Tantalus Formation lies beneath a seal of younger volcanic strata. Strata of the Late Norian Mandanna member of the Aksala formation near Takhini Hotsprings do not contain fluvial strata: laminated, bioturbated, intraclast-bearing red sandstones were deposited in an intertidal setting, and may have lost most of their organic material prior to burial. RÉSUMÉ D’importantes strates conglomératiques de la Formation de Tantalus datant du Jurassique tardif au Crétacé précoce se sont déposées à la fois dans des cours d’eau anostomosés peu profonds et dans
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".