Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
On the scientific name: In 1753, Linnaeus originally named this plant Vaccinium hispidulum (Cafferty & Jarvis 2002). In 1817, Salisbury renamed it Chiogenes serphyllifolig. In the 1950s, scientists saw a connection of the plant to Gaultheria procumbens in terms of its berry and connection to intermediate forms of the genus in South America. Thus, the plant received the name Gaultheria hispidula. Gaultheria comes from a Canadian court physician and naturalist in the early 1700s named Jean-Francois Gaulthier (Sulak 1981). Hispidula is a latin word that refers to the hairs on the leaves and stem (Shackleford 2011). On the common name: G. hispidula and its relative Gaultheria procumbens (Wintergreen) were also called moxie, moxie berry, moxie-plum. G. hispidula was also called creeping pearlberry. The term moxie may have come from the base “mashihka ” (Cree) and “maskikky ” (Ojibwa) meaning “herb infusion ” (Cassidy 1995). Dr. Augustin Thompson named his nerve medicine that could have been made out of G. hispidula or G. procumbens “moxie ” presumably from the Cree and Objibwa medicine (Cassidy 1995, Shackleford 2011). The term moxie was used for a soda drink
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it