Diacu (Canada) and Donald Saari (USA). In alphabetical order, they were:
Bibliographic record
Abstract
1 The programme of the workshop consisted of 45-minute talks followed by 15 minutes of discussions. Often those discussions have been continued in the evening in smaller groups. The schedule was planned by the two organizers as follows: Sunday, April 18 8:30-9:15, Alain Chenciner: Rotating eights 9:30-10:15, Ernesto A. Lacomba: Symbolic dynamics in the rectilinear 3-body problem 11:00-11:45, Montserrat Corbera: Global existence of subharmonic orbits in the Sitnikov Problem 14:30-15:15, Richard Montgomery: Fitting hyperbolic pants to a 3-body problem 16:00-16:45, Dan Offin: Variational-stability method for some n-body problems Monday, April 19 8:30-9:15, Ernesto Perez-Chavela: Symmetrical central configurations in the 4-body problem 9:30-10:15, Ken Meyer: Elliptic central configuration solutions of the n-body problem 11:00-11:45, Patricia Yanguas: Dynamics of charged particles in planetary magnetospheres 14:30-15:15, Alain Albouy: New hidden symmetries in the Kepler problem and Lambert’s theorem 16:00-16:45, Gareth Roberts: Linear stability analysis of the figure-eight orbit
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.364 | 0.177 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".