AND NOTES ON THE'ICE CAVES'OF THE MARITIME PROVINCES
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Several caves and sinkholes where snow and ice persist well into the summer exist in Nova Scotia and New Brunswick. In the past they were sometimes used as a source of ice or for cold storage, and are known locally as 'ice caves ' or 'ice holes'. Although they are not true ice caves in the speleological sense of the term because they do not contain perennial ice, they are very similar. Woodville lce Cave in Hants County, Nova Scotia, described here, is a particularly good example. Invertebrates and bats recorded from such sites are briefly discussed and the possibility of finding psychrophilic fauna in them is suggested. Plusieurs grottes et dolines sont pr6sentes ldr oi la neige et la glace ne disparaissent que tard durant l'616 en Nouvelle-Ecosse t au Nouveau-Brunswick. Autrefois, elles 6taient parfois utilis6es comme sources de glace ou auxfins d'entreposage sous froid. A l '6chel le locale, el les sont connues ous le nom de glacidres ou de puits de neige. El les ne sont pas de v6ri tables glacidres au sens habituel dans le domaine de la sp6l6ologie parce qu'el les ne contiennent pas de glace p6renne, mais el les sont trds semblables. La grotte Woodvil le (Woodvi l le lce Cave)dans le comt6 de Hants (N.-E.) decri te dans le p16sent document, est un trds bon exemple. Nous discutons bridvementdes invert6b16s et des chauves-souris observ6s dans de telles grottes et dolines, et nous sugg6rons qu ' i l est peulCtre possible d'y observer des organismes psychrophiles.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".