MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7100722144

PARAGENESIS AND ORIGIN OF SECONDARY BERYLLOPHOSPHATES: BERYLLONITE AND HYDROXYLHERDERITE FROM THE BEP GRANITIC PEGMATITE,

2015· article· en· W7100722144 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicCrystal Structures and Properties
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPegmatiteParagenesisLiquationBerylliumMineralWolframiteGreisen
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Rare occurrences of phosphates with beryllium are limited to granitic pegmatites and, exceptionally, to rare-element granites. Primary crystallization is extremely scarce; most of these phosphates form as late subsolidus phases. Paragenetic relationships of these minerals and conditions of their origin are poorly understood. Beryllonite, hydroxylherderite and carbonate-fluorapatite form thin coatings in fissures of beryl in the Archean petalite-subtype BEP pegmatite in southeastern Manitoba. The composition of beryllonite corresponds to its ideal formula, and hydroxylherderite contains only traces of fluorine. The B-type carbonate-fluorapatite shows considerably reduced P2O5 content, “excess ” fluorine, and an apparently high CO2 content (estimated at ~5 to ~7 wt.%). Beryllonite was the first phosphate to precipitate, followed and in part replaced by hydroxylherderite; carbonate-fluorapatite rims, penetrates and replaces both preceding phases. Low a(F) is indicated during the formation of beryllonite and hydroxylherderite, but it must have increased to stabilize carbonate-fluorapatite. The process probably involved F released during the (OH)F –1 exchange in the associated montebrasite.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.493
Threshold uncertainty score0.658

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCrystal Structures and PropertiesFrench-language works237,207