PARAGENESIS AND ORIGIN OF SECONDARY BERYLLOPHOSPHATES: BERYLLONITE AND HYDROXYLHERDERITE FROM THE BEP GRANITIC PEGMATITE,
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Rare occurrences of phosphates with beryllium are limited to granitic pegmatites and, exceptionally, to rare-element granites. Primary crystallization is extremely scarce; most of these phosphates form as late subsolidus phases. Paragenetic relationships of these minerals and conditions of their origin are poorly understood. Beryllonite, hydroxylherderite and carbonate-fluorapatite form thin coatings in fissures of beryl in the Archean petalite-subtype BEP pegmatite in southeastern Manitoba. The composition of beryllonite corresponds to its ideal formula, and hydroxylherderite contains only traces of fluorine. The B-type carbonate-fluorapatite shows considerably reduced P2O5 content, “excess ” fluorine, and an apparently high CO2 content (estimated at ~5 to ~7 wt.%). Beryllonite was the first phosphate to precipitate, followed and in part replaced by hydroxylherderite; carbonate-fluorapatite rims, penetrates and replaces both preceding phases. Low a(F) is indicated during the formation of beryllonite and hydroxylherderite, but it must have increased to stabilize carbonate-fluorapatite. The process probably involved F released during the (OH)F –1 exchange in the associated montebrasite.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".