THE PHILIPPINE ECONOMY IN 2007 and Prospects for 2008
Bibliographic record
Abstract
capped the year 2007 with a GDP growth of 7.3 percent, its highest in 31 years. The government and private institutions, however, are in agreement that this feat will be difficult to replicate in 2008 as the Philippines faces three major challenges- the growing risks of US recession; the rapid rise of the peso; and the escalating prices of oil in the world market. The key challenge lies in mitigating the impact of these risks. The domestic economy expanded by 7.4 percent in the fourth quarter of 2007, bringing the full year gross domestic product (GDP) growth to 7.3 percent, in line with the high end of the government’s target of 6.9 to 7.3 percent. It was also the fourth consecutive year of over 5 percent growth, rarely seen in the Philippines’ economic history of boom and bust cycle. The gross national product (GNP) also saw a substantial increase from 6.1 percent in 2006 to 7.8 percent with the continued inflow of remittances from abroad. Backing the 2007 growth were the record-breaking performance of services, particularly its finance, trade and private services subsectors; the higher than usual growth of industry; and the robust expansion of the farm sector. On the demand side, strong consumer and investment spending largely supported the 7.3-percent GDP growth, the country’s highest in 31 years. The services sector, whose growth peaked at 9.0 percent in the fourth quarter of 2007, finished with an 8.7 percent full-year growth, its highest ever. With the exception of government services, all subsectors registered significant increases.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.037 | 0.022 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".