THE PHILIPPINE ECONOMY IN 2007 and Prospects for 2008
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
capped the year 2007 with a GDP growth of 7.3 percent, its highest in 31 years. The government and private institutions, however, are in agreement that this feat will be difficult to replicate in 2008 as the Philippines faces three major challenges- the growing risks of US recession; the rapid rise of the peso; and the escalating prices of oil in the world market. The key challenge lies in mitigating the impact of these risks. The domestic economy expanded by 7.4 percent in the fourth quarter of 2007, bringing the full year gross domestic product (GDP) growth to 7.3 percent, in line with the high end of the government’s target of 6.9 to 7.3 percent. It was also the fourth consecutive year of over 5 percent growth, rarely seen in the Philippines’ economic history of boom and bust cycle. The gross national product (GNP) also saw a substantial increase from 6.1 percent in 2006 to 7.8 percent with the continued inflow of remittances from abroad. Backing the 2007 growth were the record-breaking performance of services, particularly its finance, trade and private services subsectors; the higher than usual growth of industry; and the robust expansion of the farm sector. On the demand side, strong consumer and investment spending largely supported the 7.3-percent GDP growth, the country’s highest in 31 years. The services sector, whose growth peaked at 9.0 percent in the fourth quarter of 2007, finished with an 8.7 percent full-year growth, its highest ever. With the exception of government services, all subsectors registered significant increases.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it