Bibliographic record
Abstract
Vegetation mosaics of grassland and exposed soil are often the outcome of intense herbivory and represent alternate stable states, although the vegetational and soil processes that both initiate and maintain the states in response to herbivory are poorly understood. 2 The vegetation mosaic resulting from grubbing by geese was examined on the intertidal flats at La Pérouse Bay, Manitoba. Soil properties of the alternate states were measured in conjunction with the ability of transplanted tillers of Puccinellia phryganodes to grow in exposed soil and intact swards. Simulated grubbed patches (2.5–40 cm diameter) were prepared at three sites and the soil properties and inward clonal growth of the grass in each patch were examined during two growing seasons. 3 Where an organic layer was still present on exposed areas, soil properties were similar to those in the rooting zone beneath intact swards, except that soils were hyper-rather than hyposaline. Older exposed mineral soils, where the organic layer had been eroded, were similarly hypersaline, but were also low in soil moisture and total nitrogen, and compacted with a low infiltration rate. Transplanted tillers survived in intact swards, but few survived in any hypersaline soils. 4 Changes in soil properties over two seasons depended on size of experimentally created patches. Again, high salinities developed in soils of the larger patches, and there was a loss of nitrogen and soil moisture and an increase in bulk density with increasing patch size. Although inward clonal growth of P. phryganodes took place from plot perimeters, this is likely to be curtailed by high salinities in plots over 20 cm diameter.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.727 | 0.596 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".