Manuscript submitted to the Canadian Geotechnical Journal
Bibliographic record
Abstract
For Review Purposes Only/Aux fins d'examen seulement 2Analyses of water diversion along inclined covers with capillary barrier effects M. Aubertin*, E. Cifuentes, S. Apithy, B. Bussière, J. Molson, and R.P. Chapuis Abstract: Various types of cover systems can be used to control water infiltration into waste disposal sites. In this regard, an interesting option is to combine different types of soil to create a layered cover with capillary barrier effects (CCBE). A CCBE basically involves the placement of layers that include a relatively fine-grained soil, such as silt, over a coarser material. The difference in unsaturated hydrogeological properties between these two soils serves to impede water percolation downward across the interface, as moisture is preferentially retained in the top soil layer. The stored moisture can later be released by evaporation during dry spells. In sloping areas, the CCBE also acts to promote lateral water diversion. Inclined CCBEs, however, are relatively complex as their behaviour is influenced by numerous factors. In this paper, the authors present the main results ensuing from a numerical investigation into the response of steeply inclined CCBEs where the moisture retaining layer is made of silty materials. The study evaluates the behaviour of two types of covers: one that pertains to dry climates where short term
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.603 | 0.308 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".