The incomplete revolution: Theorizing gender whwn studying men who provide care to aging parents. En Men and Maculinities 2007 9: 491. Disponible en http: //jmm.sagepub.com/content/9/4/491 (Recuperado el 3 de enero de
Bibliographic record
Abstract
der ” as an unproblematized dichotomous variable functioned to contain feminist influ-ence in sociology. Although there has clearly been a revolution in gender studies since that time, there are still whole areas of sociological investigation where this revolution is at best incomplete. One such area involves the literature on the care that adult children provide to aging parents. Using arguments relating to gender-as-performance and hege-monic masculinity, the authors investigate conceptualizations of gender and masculinity in a sample of fifty-eight adult sons who provide care to an aging parent. What emerges from the interviews with these male caregivers is a vision of masculinity that is in some ways quite different from the hegemonic ideal. And yet, like earlier investigators who have studied hegemonic masculinity, the authors also find that the existence of a nonhegemonic vision of masculinity does not threaten the hegemonic ideal. Key words: hegemonic masculinity; masculinities; son’s caregiving; gender theory; feminist revolution In a well-known article written two decades ago, Judith Stacy and Barrie Thorne (1985) talked of “the missing feminist revolution in sociology. ” By this, they did not mean that feminism had had no influence on sociology. On the contrary, they took note of the fact that sociologists were paying more attention to women’s experiences, that feminists had helped to correct androcentric bias in many areas of sociological investigation, and that sociol-ogists were now more sensitive to the different experiences of men and women in society. Even so, they argued, sociology was missing out on a fem-inist revolution that had already reshaped basic conceptual frameworks in Authors ’ Note: The data presented here were collected as part of a larger study of men’s filial
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.010 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.049 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.014 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".