Alienation of Immiqrants'
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In response to loss of prestige and awareness of limited opportunities for regaining higher social positions and prominence, status-discrepant immigrants are likely to engage intensively in voluntary association activities of a distinct status-group character. The negative status discrepancy resulting from pressure of forces outside the control of status-discrepant immigrants will most probably lead to political conserva-tivism. While membership in status groups provides status-discrepant immigrants with identification and shields them from psychic reaction to the loss of prestige, it also represents alienation from their ethnic group as well as from the larger society. This report presents partial findings of a survey concerning factionalism in the Serbian ethnic group, which recently experienced a schism in its church which serves as the primary source of Serbian historical identification. The schism occurred over the question of whether the supreme body of the Serbian Or-thodox Church in Yugoslavia had the right to suspend and to divest Bishop Dionysius and to divide the single Serbian Orthodox diocese in the United States and Canada into three dio-ceses. The supporters of the bishop insisted that the Mother Church functions under the pres-sure of the Yugoslav communist regime. The bishop argued in one of his Epistles (Dionysius, 1963) that the formation of three new dioceses "was demanded and desired by Tito's regime, which hinders the work of this diocese, and which desires to subjugate also this part of the free Serbs through bishops loyal to it. " After the bishop's repudiation of the Mother Church, the Serbian religioethnic community began splitting into two hostile factions, with the ma-jority of members in 20 out of 59 parishes in the United States declaring loyalty to Bishop Dionysius. For reasons of alleged conspiracy of * This manuscript was presented at the annual
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.016 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".