Case Report Rapport de cas Autonomic dysfunction in a Jack Russell terrier
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract — A 4-year-old Jack Russell terrier was presented with an array of clinical signs suggestive of autonomic dysfunction. Many of the clinical signs were consistent with a diagnosis of dysautonomia; however, both chronicity and resolution of signs contradicted a diagnosis of this disease. Résumé — Dysfonctionnement du système autonome chez un Jack Russell terrier. Un Jack Russell terrier âgé de 4 ans a été présenté avec un éventail de signes cliniques suggérant un dysfonctionnement du système autonome. Plusieurs signes cliniques étaient compatibles avec un diagnostic de dysautonomie; cependant, la chronicité et la résolution des signes ont contredit le diagnostic de cette maladie. (Traduit par Isabelle Vallières) Can Vet J 2011;52:297–299 A 4-year-old castrated male Jack Russell terrier was presented to the Ontario Veterinary College with a 7-week history of lethargy, vomiting, diarrhea, anorexia, weight loss, and epi-sodes of collapse. Bilateral keratoconjunctivitis sicca (KCS) was diagnosed approximately 1 wk after the onset of gastrointestinal signs. Transient dysuria was also reported, but had resolved by the time of presentation. Diagnostic tests performed by the referring veterinarian included abdominal radiographs, fecal analysis, complete blood (cell) count (CBC), serum biochem-istry profile, and an adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) stimulation test. The results of these tests were within reference ranges. The dog was treated for its gastrointestinal signs with famotidine, sucralfate, metoclopramide, ampicillin, metronida-zole, and intravenous fluids. The dog was referred to the Ontario
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.008 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".