Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract: The holotype of Acronothrus nukuhivae is redescribed, and the subspecies A. n. hivaoae is synonymized. The species is recombined with the generic name Crotonia Thorell, 1876. Through the courtesy of Dr Nixon Wilson, Bishop Museum, Hawaii, I have been able to redescribe the holotype of Acronothrus nukuhivae Jacot. The synonymy of this genus with Crotonia Thorell 1876 has been established by Ramsay & Luxton (1967). The specimen had been cleaned and mounted in Canada Balsam but, unfortunately, before this had set drifting occurred so that the mite was obscured by ringing compound and optical distortion at the edge of the cover slip. It has now been dissolved out with chloroform, rehydrated, and partly cleared by treatment with a mixture of lactic acid, acetic acid and water ( 1: 1: 2). For this study it was examined in glycerine. During preparation Jacot removed the thick hump of Cerotegument and detritus from the dorsum and the similar layer which covers most of the rest of the body surface, in-cluding the legs. Part of the tritonymph cuticle remained attached to the caudal apophy-ses. The c setae of the dorsal surface were detached and lost as were also the 2nd and 3rd legs of the left side. Some of the surface features are obscured by opaque internal substances and food boli. Crotonia nukuhivae (Jacot), new comb.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.150 | 0.029 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".