MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7101119142

MARQUESAS ISLANDS

2015· article· en· W7101119142 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicInvertebrate Immune Response Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHolotypeDorsumGenusSubspeciesSetaClearance
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract: The holotype of Acronothrus nukuhivae is redescribed, and the subspecies A. n. hivaoae is synonymized. The species is recombined with the generic name Crotonia Thorell, 1876. Through the courtesy of Dr Nixon Wilson, Bishop Museum, Hawaii, I have been able to redescribe the holotype of Acronothrus nukuhivae Jacot. The synonymy of this genus with Crotonia Thorell 1876 has been established by Ramsay & Luxton (1967). The specimen had been cleaned and mounted in Canada Balsam but, unfortunately, before this had set drifting occurred so that the mite was obscured by ringing compound and optical distortion at the edge of the cover slip. It has now been dissolved out with chloroform, rehydrated, and partly cleared by treatment with a mixture of lactic acid, acetic acid and water ( 1: 1: 2). For this study it was examined in glycerine. During preparation Jacot removed the thick hump of Cerotegument and detritus from the dorsum and the similar layer which covers most of the rest of the body surface, in-cluding the legs. Part of the tritonymph cuticle remained attached to the caudal apophy-ses. The c setae of the dorsal surface were detached and lost as were also the 2nd and 3rd legs of the left side. Some of the surface features are obscured by opaque internal substances and food boli. Crotonia nukuhivae (Jacot), new comb.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.468
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.015

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicInvertebrate Immune Response MechanismsFrench-language works237,207