MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7101393459 · doi:10.1093/eurpub/ckaf161.1641

Towards sustainable care for MDRO carriers: network analyses to reveal information exchange pathways

2025· article· en· W7101393459 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Public Health · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicAntibiotic Use and Resistance
Canadian institutionsAthena Sustainable Materials Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCLARITYInformation exchangeHealth information exchangeHealth careInformation flowInformation sharing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background To prevent the spread of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs), medical information exchange between healthcare professionals about MDRO carriage is essential to timely initiate infection prevention and control measures. This study investigates information exchange about MDRO carriage between healthcare professionals and to explores the perceived clarity about collaborative roles and responsibilities. Methods Quantitative methods were used to explore information exchange networks through an online survey. A realistic clinical scenario was presented to healthcare professionals in primary, secondary and home-based nursing care (N = 122) reflecting their current daily practice. Social network analysis techniques were used to analyse the networks on a network and node level, which provided insight into collaborative structures and potential brokers. Additionally, respondents reflected on the (clarity of) roles and responsibilities of all involved, and on current frameworks and guidelines. Results Information exchange structures were visualized in a network graph, illustrating the information flow following established MDRO carriage during, or after recent, hospital admission. Several healthcare professionals were identified who could potentially take on a brokerage role in information exchange towards home-based nursing care. Healthcare professionals expressed a need for more clarity about roles and responsibilities, more uniform and timely information exchange, and indicated a preference as to which healthcare professionals could take on a coordinating role. Conclusions Current information exchange structures have a promising basis to achieve effective communication about MDRO carriage between healthcare professionals in different care settings. Improving uniformity and clarity about roles and responsibilities, could aid in timely initiation of infection prevention and control measures and contribute to sustainable care for MDRO carriers. Key messages • Information exchange between healthcare professionals about MDRO carriage is essential to ultimately prevent transmission and spread of MDROs. • Improving uniformity of information exchange and clarity about roles and responsibilities is needed to move towards sustainable care for MDRO carriers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.026
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.029

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.026
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0070.006
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.006
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Journal of Public HealthSame topicAntibiotic Use and ResistanceFrench-language works237,207