MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7101445463 · doi:10.1093/eurpub/ckaf161.1667

Treatment of post-weaning depression and dysphoric milk ejection reflex – a scoping review

2025· article· en· W7101445463 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Public Health · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBreastfeeding Practices and Influences
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDepression (economics)PsycINFOBreastfeedingMental healthMEDLINEDepressive symptomsHistory of depression

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract While breastfeeding has many benefits for mother and baby, some women experience breastfeeding-associated depressive moods such as Dysphoric Milk Ejection Reflex (D-MER) and post-weaning depression. This scoping review provides an overview of influencing factors and potential prevention and treatment strategies. A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, and PsycINFO (April 2024). Screening was performed independently by two reviewers using Covidence. A total of eleven studies with data on 670 women were included. Seven of the studies reported data on D-MER, four on post-weaning depression. Studies originated from Tasmania, Egypt, China, Japan, Canada, and the USA. Possible protective factors for the prevention of D-MER included expressing milk, adequate fluid intake and sufficient sleep and rest. Possible risk factors for the development of D-MER include prolonged breaks from breastfeeding, acute stress, caffeine consumption and existing mental illness. In case of post-weaning depression, both pre-existing mental illnesses and the presence of previous mental illnesses in the family were cited as risk factors. Treatments for D-MER included antidepressants, herbal supplements, psychotherapy, and coping strategies like distraction or patient endurance. Post-weaning depression was treated exclusively with antidepressants in the studies. The number of studies on breastfeeding-associated depressive moods is very limited. Seven of the included studies were case reports and case series, four were cross-sectional studies. These studies primarily described cases of D-MER and post-weaning depression but did not explicitly investigate the relationship between factors influencing the development of depressive mood. Nor did they investigate the effectiveness and safety of prevention and treatment interventions. High-quality intervention studies would be important to provide evidence-based support for affected women. Key messages • The number of studies on breastfeeding-associated depressive moods is very limited. • D-MER and post-weaning depression are underrecognized conditions. Better research is needed to support women with evidence-base care.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.017
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.017
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.004
Bibliometrics0.0070.006
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.081
GPT teacher head0.395
Teacher spread0.314 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Journal of Public HealthSame topicBreastfeeding Practices and InfluencesFrench-language works237,207