Bibliographic record
Abstract
Tis volume is unique in its examination of the impact of Xi Jinping's leadership across a broad scope of issue areas.When Rongbin Han and I commenced planning for the project at the American Political Science Association's annual conference in 2018, no one had done anything quite like it, though scholars had written about Xi's family background, views on governance, and experiences prior to becoming the most powerful Chinese leader since Deng Xiaoping.To supplement our own skills, we needed to recruit other scholars with diverse disciplinary backgrounds.Researchers working on the project had to have sufcient expertise to consider Xi's efect-not simply on political life-but also on related topics: the anti-corruption campaign, poverty alleviation, economic inequality, religion, public service provision, state surveillance, Han-minority tensions, and China-Taiwan relations.Consequently, we encouraged scholars worldwide to submit paper proposals and hosted the "Xi Jinping Efect" international conference at the Banf Centre in Alberta, Canada, in 2019.Six of the conference papers were published in the Journal of Contemporary China, volume 30, numbers 131 and 132 (2021).One of those, "Xi Jinping's Counter-Reformation: Te Reassertion of Ideological Governance in Historical Perspective" by Timothy Cheek, is included here with permission of Taylor & Francis.Other papers, which complicate and even problematize the Xi efect, were reserved and developed for publication in this book.We solicited additional chapters to fll important gaps and wrote an introductory overview, and Kevin J. O'Brien drafed a concluding chapter, based on his insightful commentary at the conference.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".