Perspektif hubungan Malaysia – Indonesia : \nsatu tinjauan dalam kalangan kepimpinan belia Indonesia / \nSiti Melinda Haris ... [et al.]
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Hubungan Malaysia-Indonesia telah berlarutan sejak sekian lama, sedari era kegemilangan kerajaan Melayu lama di Nusantara sehingga kedua-duanya berjaya mencapai kemerdekaan pada tahun 1940-50an. Sesungguhnya, persahabatan dalam era moden ini banyak sekali cabarannya dan ianya dihambat dengan pelbagai isu. Masalah tenaga kerja, isu perbatasan, isu kebudayaan dan sebagainya dikenalpasti antara beberapa faktor yang mewarnai hubungan diplomatik kedua buah negara ini. Kajian ini dilakukan menerusi pendekatan kualitatif dan kuantitatif, di mana ianya telah melibatkan 73 orang responden dalam kalangan pemimpin beberapa persatuan belia di Indonesia. Ia meliputi sebahagian bandar-bandar utama di Indonesia seperti Medan, Padang, Jakarta, Bandung, Surabaya dan Banjarmasin dengan proses pengumpulan data telah bermula dari bulan November 2013 dan berakhir pada Ogos 2014. Kajian ini telah mengenalpasti persepsi serta pandangan kepimpinan belia Indonesia terhadap isu yang pada pendapat mereka kerapkali menghantui hubungan ini dan perlu diberikan perhatian. Beberapa cadangan turut diberikan bagi menyuburkan akar hubungan ke dua rumpun ini.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".