Genevieve Carter interview, 1987 Feb. 24
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Carter, Genevieve by John Milner - Audio Oral History Interview - CSWA ❧ Interview by John Milner on February 24, 1987. An interview with Dr. Genevieve Carter as she recounts her experiences with the Manzanar program. ❧ CONTENTS: (0:47) Introduction by John Milner. CONTENTS: (1:23) Carter explaining what the Manzanar program was. (5:01) Finishing Doctorate's degree at Berkeley and working at the Institute of Child's Welfare. (9:12) Integration of psychiatry and social and the progression of social work. (18:02) Social organization of the Japanese. (22:48) Reports of rioting at the Manzanar camp and its results. (31:12) Medical programs within the camps. (37:50) Selecting a director of social within the camp. (44:53) Personal relationships that existed between Caucasian staff members and Japanese interns. (51:10) Carter's work with the children's program. (57:23) Rational of brining children that were only a quarter Japanese. (58:34) Starting a library in the camp. (1:06:32) The emotions and feelings of both staff and interments. (1:10:45) The war effort recruitment and political and economic forces influencing the removal of the Japanese ❧ Genevieve Carter (1907-1998). Social worker, researcher. Genevieve Carter Interview. Interviewed by John Milner. Date of interview: 2-24-87. 1 cassette tape. Length of interview: 1 hour and 30 minutes. Transcript of interview: 28 pp. CD containing interview and transcript. INTERVIEW TOPICS: Detention of Japanese; other taped interviews re Manzanar; reasons for involvement with Manzanar; other persons' involvement; maintenance of Japanese family unity; educational background; Manzanar camp philosophy; physical plant; food; camp social organization; riot; resolution of problems; medical and dental services; staff composition; general camp meetings; visit of "Happy" Chandler; relationship between Caucasian staff and the Japanese; outside community relations; children's programs; camp library; adult education, religion; recreation; emotions and feelings of staff and the Japanese; concluding remarks. ❧ ADDITIONAL MATERIALS: 1. California Social Work Hall of Distinction Biography ( https://socialworkhallofdistinction.usc.edu/honorees/ ). 2. Personal biographical newsletter (2 copies). 3. Announcements of memorial tribute to celebrate life of Genevieve Carter. 4. Brief biographical outline. 5. 2 photographs of Genevieve Carter: 1 6 x 4 in. of G. Carter with Monika White and Frances Lomas Feldman (4-8-94). 6. Photocopies of Japanese-American relocation announcements and of maps of internment camps. 7. "Ansel Adams' Manzanar," Los Angeles Times (7 August 1999), Part VI: 1, 8. 8. Genevieve Carter, "The Service Side of the FAP Bill: What Does our Research Tell Us?." Paper presented at the Conference on Issues in Social Welfare Policy Curriculum, Center for Continuing Education, Chicago, Illinois, 29-30 November 1970. 9. Interview with Genevieve Carter re Helen Dean monograph. 9-24/25-94. 10. Rough draft of Helen Dean monograph. 11. 1 cassette tape from "Sound Portraits": Memories of Manzanar: Dr. Genevieve W. Carter's Own Words. 12. 1 diskette of transcript of Hamovitch interview. 13. 1 diskette of transcript of Feldman/White/Carter interview. 14. 1 diskette of transcript of Milner interview. 15. Los Angeles Times editorial (7-10-98): "Keeping Manzanar's Message."
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.117 | 0.027 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".