MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7104178460 · doi:10.5267/j.ijdns.2025.9.011

Text-to-image fashion design generation using stable diffusion: A comprehensive framework for AI-assisted creative workflows

2025· article· en· W7104178460 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Data and Network Science · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGenerative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersKing Khalid University
KeywordsFashion designWorkflowOriginalityQuality (philosophy)ArchitectureAutomationFashion industryPreprocessor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The fashion industry increasingly relies on artificial intelligence technologies to enhance creative workflows and accelerate design innovation. This research presents a comprehensive framework that employs Generative Adversarial Net- works and advanced diffusion models to generate high-quality fashion imagery from textual descriptions. The proposed system integrates Stable Diffusion architecture with specialized text preprocessing pipelines to create diverse, photo realistic fashion designs that align with textual specifications while maintaining aesthetic coherence and commercial viability. The framework was evaluated using a dataset of 10,000 high-resolution fashion images, with systematic assessment conducted across multiple performance dimensions including creativity, aesthetic appeal, design diversity, and semantic consistency. Experimental results demonstrate exceptional performance in creative design generation, achieving average scores of 4.7 for originality and 4.5 for aesthetic quality based on comprehensive evaluation by thirty participants. The system successfully produces varied design alternatives from similar prompts, indicating robust exploration of design possibilities rather than repetitive pattern generation. While text prompt accuracy achieved a moderate score of 3.8, highlighting opportunities for enhanced semantic interpretation, the overall results validate the framework’s capability to support professional fashion design workflows. The research contributes to the growing body of knowledge in AI-assisted creative applications and demonstrates significant potential for transforming traditional fashion design processes through intelligent automation and creative augmentation technologies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.712
Threshold uncertainty score0.957

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.082
GPT teacher head0.360
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Data and Network ScienceSame topicGenerative Adversarial Networks and Image SynthesisFrench-language works237,207