MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7104181169 · doi:10.5267/j.ijdns.2025.9.023

The impact of business intelligence on electronic commerce growth: The mediating role of customer behavior analytics

2025· article· en· W7104181169 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Data and Network Science · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicBig Data and Business Intelligence
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnalyticsTheory of planned behaviorStructural equation modelingSample (material)Business intelligenceE-commerceCustomer relationship managementCustomer engagement

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper investigates the influence of Business Intelligence (BI) technologies on the growth of electronic commerce, with a specific emphasis on the mediating impact of Customer Behavior Analytics (CBA). Grounded in the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB). The paper sample comprised 330 customers who use the Amazon website in Jordan. A survey was utilized to gauge the impact of business intelligence on electronic commerce growth: the mediating role of customer behavior analytics. 282 questionnaires were returned for statistical analysis, adopting the quantitative approach, and analyzed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). The outputs explain that both positive personal attitudes and BI adoption have a significant and positive effect on electronic commerce growth. Moreover, these factors contribute to enhancing CBA, which improves the ability to identify and capitalize on market opportunities in the digital environment. In theory, this study advances TPB by incorporating BI into models of entrepreneurial development. Practically, it offers smart strategies for nurturing a positive entrepreneurial attitude, widening the availability of BI tools, as well as developing electronic commerce ecosystems driven by BI that enhance operations and fuel the success of e-commerce websites.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.482
Threshold uncertainty score0.651

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0040.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.356
Teacher spread0.308 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Data and Network ScienceSame topicBig Data and Business IntelligenceFrench-language works237,207