ESTIMACIÓN INDIRECTA DEL GASTO ENERGÉTICO, COMPOSICIÓN CORPORAL Y CAPACIDAD AERÓBICA EN ESTUDIANTES UNIVERSITARIOS DE ENTRENAMIENTO
Bibliographic record
Abstract
El presente estudio analizó el perfil fisiológico de 364 estudiantes del programa de Tecnología en Entrenamiento Deportivo de una institución universitaria, mediante la estimación indirecta de variables de composición corporal, metabolismo basal y capacidad cardiorrespiratoria. Los datos fueron obtenidos durante actividades académicas prácticas correspondientes a cinco grupos de la asignatura Fisiología del Ejercicio. Se emplearon ecuaciones predictivas validadas para estimar indicadores como el porcentaje de grasa corporal, la tasa metabólica basal (BMR), el gasto energético total (TDEE) y el consumo máximo de oxígeno (VO₂máx). Los resultados mostraron diferencias significativas entre hombres y mujeres en variables como masa magra, BMR y TDEE, evidenciando patrones fisiológicos diferenciados por sexo. Asimismo, se identificaron relaciones significativas entre la edad, el porcentaje de grasa corporal y la capacidad aeróbica. Los hallazgos proporcionan bases relevantes para fortalecer estrategias pedagógicas y de seguimiento físico en el contexto académico deportivo.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.021 | 0.010 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".