MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7104393696 · doi:10.55016/ojs/cpai.v6i1.76962

A Roadmap Towards Integrity: A President's Perspective Twenty Years On

2023· article· W7104393696 on OpenAlexaffabout

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Perspectives on Academic Integrity · 2023
Typearticle
Language
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAcademic integrity and plagiarism
Canadian institutionsYorkville University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMisconductPerspective (graphical)Academic integrityDisciplineAcademic dishonestyResearch integrityKey (lock)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this session, I will share what prompted my original 2002-2003 study on student academic misconduct with Don McCabe, published in the Canadian Journal of Higher Education, and my reflections on what has transpired in the ensuing twenty years. Highlighting key observations from my more recent contributions (in Handbook of Academic Integrity and Academic Integrity in Canada: An Enduring and Essential Challenge), I will present a roadmap towards integrity, with implications for senior university administrators (as well as faculty and students), committed to strengthening the integrity of the academy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.018
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.625
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.018
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.006
Science and technology studies0.0030.003
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0040.000
Research integrity0.0100.059
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.012

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.344
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Perspectives on Academic IntegritySame topicAcademic integrity and plagiarismFrench-language works237,207